Lists of basic needs necessary for a decent human life have found their way into approaches to sustainable development such as the “Safe and Just Space for Humanity” framework. The “dominant” conceptions of a decent human life have been criticised by social groups which find themselves at the margins of public debates such as the Degrowth or Post-colonial movements. According to the latter, the dominant conceptions neglect certain values which are necessary constituents of a decent human life: meaningful activities, convivial activities, and relationships of certain quality (love, respect, harmony, care) towards human and other-than-human beings. With this paper, we present results of interviews with male Maasai pastoralists in a village in Northern Tanzania in which we elicited what they consider as requirements for a good human life. According to our results, Maasai pastoralists disagree about the necessary constituents of a decent human life as well, replicating the controversy from the international debates between the proponents of the dominant approaches and their critics from Post-colonial and Degrowth movements.
Read moreThis paper aims to identify and analyze Tanzanian smallholder farmers’ attitudes toward nature. The field was approached with a combined method, a content analysis of a body of literature and a qualitative study with smallholder farmers as well as their representatives. The literature analysis revealed three different types of evaluative attitudes toward nature in texts representing smallholder farmers’ opinions and values, and the issues affecting them. These include the Human benefit type, the Sustainable society type, and the Harmony type. The results show that there is a discrepancy among the literature analysis, the answers of smallholder farmers, and those of their representatives. The Harmony type is not mentioned in the answers of the smallholder farmers themselves and is only marginally in those of their representatives but is present in the literature. This finding is discussed from the perspective of the rights of nature as an entry point.
Genetic modification of crops has long been, and still is, a highly controversial policy issue with some policy groups strictly opposing to it. Others consider the opposition to the use of genetically modified crops as a moral responsibility. As often in such heated debates, political realities and their ethical evaluation are much more nuanced. With our second podcast, we intend to shed light on the genetically modified crops politics in Germany and scrutinize it from the perspective of a Tanzanian political economist: a conversation between Richard Mbunda and Thomas Potthast.
Read moreStefan Ouma and Michael Spies are organizing a panel at the DKG2023-Conference in Frankfurt. For more infos
Read moreLeiyo Singo shared his thoughts about Maasaiphobia with the Nigerian „The Republic„
Read moreGenetical modification of crops has become a highly controversial policy topic. As often in heated debates, political realities and their ethical evaluation are much more nuanced. The podcast sheds light on the recent dynamics in Tanzanian politics of genetically modified crops and reflects on political interests and ethical reasons behind them: a conversation between Thomas Potthast and Richard Mbunda.
Read moreWhile on his research trip to Tanzania, Leiyo Singo was confronted with the most recent attempts to evict Tanzanian Maasai from Ngorongoro and Loliondo. In an article for Nigerian „The Repubic“, he discloses the ideological background of this politics.
Read moreStefan Ouma reflected in a key-input at the Utopia-Conference at the Leuphana University in August 2022 on possible futures of global agriculture.
Read moreStefan Ouma reflects in two recent articles on the question of how to teach and to study human geography which explicitly addresses the existing intergenerational and global injustices on the one hand and persisting inequalities in recognition of different epistemic perspectives on the other. „Wir leben gut, weil wir von anderen leben“: Externalisierung im Geographieunterricht presents and discusses educative tools for teaching existing gloabal and intergenerational injutsicies taking into account their historical roots of imperialism and colonialism. In Navigating the landscape of defiantscholarship in and beyond Africa: Onarchives, bridges and dangers he takes part in a discussion of the paper Defiant scholarship: Dismantling coloniality in contemporary African geographies by Patricia O. Daley and Amber Murrey.
Read moreRoape.net has published a coincise version of our documentation of the debates on the workshop „Beyond Productivity: Reimagining Futures of Agriculture and Bioeconomy„. As time has passed, it is inspiring to read that the debates did provide insights worthy to be elaborated and discussed further.
Read moreKerstin presents preliminary results of her research in a post on the blog Postwachstum. She describes two types of non-mainstream visions of agricultural development in Tanzania which take into account ideas of a moderate economic growth, alternative conceptions of agriculture, and of a good life.
Read moreWe have finally compiled the documentation of the discussions which took place at the online workshop on October 8th. Take a look on it! — All comments, hints, and disagreements are warmly welcomed.
Read moreIn a recent blog post on udadisi, Leiyo Singo describes how the recent water scarcities in Dar es Salaam have provided the pretext for public accusations against pastoralists, in which prominent politicians victimized them for the shortages. Reflecting on this discourse, Singo concludes: „The future is pastoralist. By this, I mean that values of solidarity, simplicity, care, sharing, cooperation not competition, and putting wellbeing/wholeness before the reductionist economic growth nonsense. Pastoralists know how.“
Read moreOn the occasion of the award of the Nobel Prize to Abdulrazak Gurnah, Singo Leiyo reflects in a contribution for udadisi on how various elements of the Maasai culture have been misrepresented, sometimes trivialized, often for commercial purposes by people from outside of this culture.
Read moreKerstin Schopp participated in the Bioeconomy Camp 2021 held by BMBF and the University of Hohenheim. The conference for junior researchers was devoted in particular to the topic of science communication, networking, and the work on as well as in-depth discussions of new bioeconomy research projects which are relevant in the future. Christoph Pöhler (Fraunhofer WKI), Jakob Kukula (Kunsthochschule Berlin-Weißensee) and Kerstin Schopp (University of Tübingen) were awarded first place by the BMBF for the project idea “StadtGrün”.
Read moreWe are glad to announce you that we are organising a panel at the conference of the African Studies Association of Africa (ASAA) 2022. Our panel “Towards Radical Reclaiming of African Economic Futures” will address visions of African futures contesting the positions of mainstream politics. While the African political mainstream envisions Africa’s future in terms of economic growth, the discourse landscape on African futures is much more diverse than this mainstream narrative suggests. Politically subdominant groups are demanding autonomous spaces to create futures outside the growth paradigm and fighting against land alienation and large infrastructural projects. Against this background, we want to discuss about topics such as the visions of desirable futures in African philosophies and the parallels between African visions of sustainable development and degrowth narratives. You can find more details on our panel here. You can see the call for abstracts and an overview of the other participating panels by clicking on the read more button below – to see the BATATA panel please go to panel 45. The conference will take place on 11-16 April 2022 and will be held at the University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa.
Read moreOur researcher Leiyo Singo has given an interview to the magazine OYA. Therein, he tells of his childhoold as member of the Maasai, a traditional people inhabiting Kenya as well as northern Tanzania, his way to Germany and his current research project in the context of BATATA. Specially, he comments on the Maasai’s way of living, their societal organisation and developments threating their circumstances such as the establishment of national parks and conservation areas. To read the full interview (German), please click on the link below.
Read moreWith this workshop, we aim to impugn the controversy around further increase of productivity: is it necessary and/or desirable for sustainable agriculture and bioeconomy? Additionally, we shall discuss whether, and if so, how decolonized visions of an agriculture without productivity growth could capture both discursive and material space. A detailed description is here. To register, drop an e-mail to batata@posteo.de.
Read moreKerstin Schopp will be giving a talk at the degrowth conference “Building Alternative Livelihoods in Times of Ecological and Political Crisis”. She will be speaking about “Tanzanian Agricultural Development and Degrowth – A(n) (im)possible Symbiosis?” The conference is concerned with the quest for alternative livelihoods which are harmonious with planetary limits and safeguard material living conditions. It is organised jointly by the international degrowth research networks, the International Society for Ecological Economics and the European Society for Ecological Economics and hosted by the University of Manchester (UK). It will take place online on 5th – 8th July 2021.
Read moreLeiyo Singo’s paper “Degrowth for the Global South? Towards Re-appropriation of Bioeconomy to Visibilize Pastoralists’ Futures in Tanzania” will be presented on the conference „Decolonising Degrowth: From Sustainability to Climate Justice“. The conference enquires into the implications and aims of the concept of degrowth. Specifically, it aims to shed light on the entanglements of culture and ecology by raising the question of the connection between degrowth and decolonisation. In his paper, Singo makes the point that the notion of bioeconomy should be reappropriated in terms of the degrowth discourse since this is the original discourse supported by that notion. This reappropriation, in turn, serves the function of acknowledging pastoralists’ futures given that the degrowth discourse corresponds to visions from decolonial and critical agrarian studies. The conference is organised by Durham University (UK) and will take place on 24th and 25th of June via zoom.
Read moreWith this text, Eugen provides an analysis of justifications of bioeconomy policy strategies. Based on a reconstruction of the argument which justifies official bioeconomy strategies, he argues that justification of a bioeconomy policy strategy requires commitment to two ethical claims which have not been made explicit in the debate so far: (i) conception of a good life; (ii) principle for risk-taking.
Read moreWith this paper published in PERIPHERIE, we address the debate on the question of how policy strategies dubbed „Bioeconomy“, which have been coined in the Global North, will impact economies in the Global South. We disagree with both, optimistic and critical positions in this debate. The optimists consider bioeconomy as a global win-win strategy supporting a transformation of the agriculture in the Global South to a high-value knowledge-based sector. The critics warn that the market-based solutions of dominant bioeoconomy strategies will entrench the coloniality of markets and knowledge engrained in formally postcolonial North-South relationships. Instead, we aim to paint a more complex picture of the local material realities of bioeconomy discourse, policies and its implementations. Firstly, we argue that the dominant bioeconomy discourse in the Global North hides the ethical controversy of its policy recommendations, which contradicts democratic ideals. Secondly, we provide initial evidence that — contrary to the depoliticized discourse in the Global North — the particular policy arenas addressed by the concept of bioeconomy in the Global South have already been politically contested in local discourses there. We make our point by analysing the case of political discourses in Tanzania, specifically those on land-use and genetically modified organisms. The published version (in German) can be accessed here. The (original) Englisch version of the paper is here.
Read moreUsing the case of Tanzania, the authors present the claim that smallholder production systems provide important resources to perform more viable African rural futures and could also prove significant for the rest of the world.
Read moreThe concept of ‚African futures‘ has recently become increasingly popular. In this paper, the authors use this concept to elaborate on the geographies, potentialities, politics as well as transformation practices that may be complementary or antagonistic to the global capitalist project.
Read moreOn October 8th, Kerstin Schopp presented a draft paper on “Three visions of bioeconomy and three discourses on agricultural development – a comparative analysis” at the workshop “It’s the (bio)economy, stupid!” organized by the BMBF junior research group Mentalities in Flux at Friedrich-Schiller University Jena (07.-08.10.2020).
Read moreOn October 1st, Kerstin Schopp talked about “Human-nature relationships at the heart of the bioeconomy and agricultural development” at the Vienna Anthropology days (online conference, 28.09.-01.10.2020) in the session Human-Environment Relations.
Read moreIn a recent contribution (German), Eugen Pissarskoi calls for a discussion about the fundamental goals of a society when designing bioeconomy strategies. On his view, securing economic competitiveness and material prosperity should not be the main goal of a society. This answer has consequences for the way bioeconomy is configured.
Read moreOn September 23rd, Eugen Pissarskoi participated in an online seminar with the topic Ethics in Bioeconomy. The seminar was part of the series „Zukunft Bioökonomie – Ansätze, Sichtweisen und Perspektiven der Bioökonomie“.
Read moreIn a recent contribution, Stefan Ouma presents a critical assessment of Africapitalism and the future(s) it envisions for Africa, pointing out that any reflexion about African future(s) must go beyond the limits of an economic system that will fall apart.
Read more